THE HYPERLIQUID WALLETS
WORTH FOLLOWING.

Hyperliquid is public, so every position on it can be read. Every night we score around 2,000 wallets, screened from 45,000 accounts for real size, real holds, liquid markets and no market makers. The list itself changes once a week.

Copied wallets are watched live through

The difference from an exchange leaderboard is what we rank on. A leaderboard ranks a wallet by its own profit, which tells you nothing about whether following it would have worked — a wallet can be hugely profitable and still be useless to copy. We rank on what copying it over the last 45 days would have made: every position it opened, copied a little late with $1,000 at 3x and a 25% stop, closed where it closed, after the fees a copier pays. A wallet makes the list only if that gave at least five copies and stayed in profit even without its two best copies. The steadiest, most weeks in profit, come first.

45-day copy score is the figure the list is ranked on, not real copiers’ results (those are published, winners and losers after fees, at Copy results). It is what copying every position the wallet opened in the last 45 days would have made with $1,000 at 3x and a 25% stop, entered slightly worse than the wallet, closed where it closed, after the fees copies actually pay; weeks up is how many of those 7 weeks were in profit. Each wallet’s page also shows its last 30 days at a 10% stop, and its own account. Copied entry is the median move over the 24 hours after each position the wallet opened in the last two weeks, with the number of entries beside it. Balance is what backs its trades, not coins it simply holds. All of it is measured after the fact — these wallets are on the list because the numbers were good, which is not a promise they stay good. Many are long-only, so their recent numbers are partly a bet on a rising market. This is discovery, not advice, and trading perps carries real risk of loss.

Questions about how copying works, what it costs or how your funds are protected? Read the FAQ.